Should you wait for the next iPad?

Friday, October 1, 2010

I think that it's reasonable to expect the following features in the next Apple iPad:
  • Webcam (probably two: front-facing plus back-facing so that you can do FaceTime)
  • Widescreen resolution? (Android and BlackBerry tablets are coming out as 7" widescreen models. Will Apple make a 7" iPad?)
  • Better battery life
  • Better performance
  • Retina display 
  • Lower price? (doubt it)
If we follow the evolution of the iPod touch, we see that Apple made similar changes from the 1st generation to the 2nd generation to the 3rd generation. The addition of a camera (or two) would be a huge upgrade for those who like to Skype or do FaceTime.
 
So, should you wait for the next version of the Apple iPad? What if you knew that it would be available in the first quarter of 2011? 
Posted by Dr. Joseph Kim at 7:00 AM
Labels: ,

Comments

No response to “Should you wait for the next iPad?”
Post a Comment | Post Comments (Atom)

Post a Comment

About Dr. Joseph Kim

My Photo
Dr. Joseph Kim is the founder of MobileHealthComputing.com, an independent website owned and operated by Dr. Kim. He is also the President of MCM Education, a professional medical education and publishing company that develops continuing medical education (CME) activities in joint sponsorship with medical universities, hospitals, and medical associations. Dr. Kim is a digital entrepreneur and technologist who has a passion for health information technology, mobile health, and social media. He frequently speaks at conferences about non-clinical careers for physicians, continuing medical education, mobile health technology, and social media in medicine. Dr. Kim holds a bachelor of science in engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a doctorate of medicine from the University of Arkansas College of Medicine, and a master of public health from the University of Massachusetts Amherst School of Public Health.
View my complete profile
Blog Widget by LinkWithin
 

Dr. Joseph Kim mentioned here: